Repository navigation
docs(seo): correct linked-page recovery comparison - #614
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
🤖 MERGED
GitHub merged this pull request. No material findings were recorded. The pull request closed. |
harlan-zw
added
the
harlan-agent-review
Collaborator
Author
|
Agent-written evidence from the 11 October recovery read:
No watch groups, URLs, indexing controls, or external links were changed. The next weekly comparison requires fresh Checkpoints after 09:00 Melbourne on 12 October. |
harlan-github-agent
Bot
added
harlan-agent-review-required
harlan-github-agent
Bot
removed
the
harlan-agent-review-required
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔗 Linked issue
Recovery plan:
docs/work/EXECUTE-seo-recovery.md.❓ Type of change
📚 Description
Experiment D treats nuxtjs-seo as unlinked, but its README has linked the canonical Skill since 29 September. Correct the brief and panel expectation so coverage cannot imply a linked-versus-unlinked effect.
Add the dated readiness read and README discovery limits. Keep all 41 watched URLs and their groups.