Repository navigation
Fix datatype ranges and preserve every facet value - #24
Merged
ValentinaPasqual merged 1 commit intoNov 11, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Datatype restrictions overwrote the base datatype and each preceding facet, leaving only the final operator and value in the generated documentation. Keep the base datatype separate from ordered facet/value pairs and render every constraint. Preserve the existing single-value accessor for callers that use it. Add regression tests for inclusive and exclusive bounds, reversed facet order, zero, patterns, and complete ranges in static index and resource pages.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Numeric datatype ranges lose their base datatype and earlier bounds during extraction, so generated documentation shows only the final constraint. For example, an integer range from 1 to 3 appears as "≤ restricted by 3".
The failing OWL statement (from monomyth ontology) that triggered this bugfix is
The bugfix crosses three layers:
>= 1and<= 3. It now stores the base datatype separately from all facet/value pairs.integer[>= 1, <= 3].Screenshots: 🖼️ main | 🖼️ this PR