Repository navigation
chore: add default CODEOWNERS - #2
Conversation
![claude[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1236702?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@eddietejeda — over to you. This repo has no CODEOWNERS file, so a new PR never auto-requests a human reviewer. Our SOC 2 change-management control is evidenced by a human review on every change, so a repo that requests nobody is a gap in the audit — this PR closes it by handing reviews to You are on it because you opened this repo. Please merge it, or reassign to whoever owns this repo. |
|
@eddietejeda — still waiting on this after 1 day. This repo has no CODEOWNERS file, so a new PR never auto-requests a human reviewer. Our SOC 2 change-management control is evidenced by a human review on every change, so a repo that requests nobody is a gap in the audit — this PR closes it by handing reviews to Please merge it, or reassign to whoever owns this repo. |
|
@eddietejeda — still waiting on this after 2 days. This repo has no CODEOWNERS file, so a new PR never auto-requests a human reviewer. Our SOC 2 change-management control is evidenced by a human review on every change, so a repo that requests nobody is a gap in the audit — this PR closes it by handing reviews to Please merge it, or reassign to whoever owns this repo. |
|
@eddietejeda — still waiting on this after 3 days. This repo has no CODEOWNERS file, so a new PR never auto-requests a human reviewer. Our SOC 2 change-management control is evidenced by a human review on every change, so a repo that requests nobody is a gap in the audit — this PR closes it by handing reviews to Please merge it, or reassign to whoever owns this repo. |
No description provided.