[robert-goheen-cko]

Summary

The repository's default GITHUB_TOKEN is now read-only. build-release.yml has no permissions: block, so the create-release step fails with "Resource not accessible by integration" after the package is uploaded to PyPI. This happened for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2: both are on PyPI, but neither has a tag or GitHub release.

Changes

• .github/workflows/build-release.yml: add permissions: contents: write to the deploy job.
• checkout_sdk/properties.py: bump the version to 4.9.3. Merging this PR runs build-release, which publishes 4.9.3 to PyPI and creates its tag and GitHub release. That also tests the permissions fix. 4.9.3 has no SDK code changes since 4.9.2.

After merging

• Check that the build-release run creates the 4.9.3 tag and GitHub release.
• Create the missing tags and releases for 4.9.1 (22ada34) and 4.9.2 (c93b91c) with gh release create.
• Don't re-run the failed 4.9.1 or 4.9.2 release runs. PyPI rejects files it already has, so they fail at the upload.

This is a stopgap until #264, which sets permissions per job and replaces actions/create-release.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[agent-wall-e]

🔴 Risk Classification: MAJOR

Approval route: AI Review + Human Approval Required
Rollback controls: Change-freeze window + documented rollback plan

Classification reasons

• security_sensitive_path:.github/workflows/build-release.yml

Operational gates

• ✅ jira_ticket
• ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 1

---

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 6b4ce2b3b45a…}

[agent-wall-e]

🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code	Kind	Clause	Meaning
security_sensitive_path — .github/workflows/build-release.yml	classifying	§2.1 M4/M5	Path matched a sensitive pattern (auth, secrets, crypto, PCI, migrations, network IaC).

Kinds:

• classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
• informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug}

[agent-wall-e]

🔵 Advisory review: Sound, but needs your judgement

This PR needs a human approval. The code itself reads as correct; whether it should land depends on context I don't have.

Adds permissions: contents: write to the deploy job to fix GitHub release creation, and bumps the version to 4.9.3. The fix is technically correct, but a human should confirm the version bump and release sequencing are intentional given that 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 already exist on PyPI without corresponding GitHub releases.

For you to decide

• The permissions: contents: write block is placed correctly on the deploy job and directly addresses the 'Resource not accessible by integration' failure described.
• The version bump from 4.9.2 to 4.9.3 is included in this PR; a reviewer should confirm this is intentional and that a 4.9.3 release is ready, rather than this being an accidental commit alongside the CI fix.
• The PR description says the missing 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 tags/releases should be created manually after merging — a reviewer should confirm there is a plan to do that, since this PR does not automate it.
• The workflow still uses actions/checkout@v2, which is unpinned and outdated, but that is a pre-existing issue not introduced here.

---

_{This is not an approval. wall-e cannot auto-approve this PR — it is an opinion to help whoever does. Advisory review · us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6 · wall-e 2026.06.19-02}

[agent-wall-e]

🔴 Risk Classification: MAJOR

Approval route: AI Review + Human Approval Required
Rollback controls: Change-freeze window + documented rollback plan

Classification reasons

• security_sensitive_path:.github/workflows/build-release.yml

Operational gates

• ✅ jira_ticket
• ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 2

---

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 6b4ce2b3b45a…}

[agent-wall-e]

🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code	Kind	Clause	Meaning
security_sensitive_path — .github/workflows/build-release.yml	classifying	§2.1 M4/M5	Path matched a sensitive pattern (auth, secrets, crypto, PCI, migrations, network IaC).

Kinds:

• classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
• informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud