Skip to content

docs: numberToDigitsCutoff defaults to 2100, not 2025 - #1328

Merged
stephenvapiai merged 2 commits into
VapiAI:mainfrom
chiranjeet-vapi:docs/number-to-digits-cutoff-default
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

stephenvapiai merged 2 commits into
VapiAI:mainfrom
chiranjeet-vapi:docs/number-to-digits-cutoff-default

Conversation

@chiranjeet-vapi

@chiranjeet-vapi chiranjeet-vapi commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

  • voice-formatting-plan.mdx and email-address-reading.mdx give the chunkPlan.formatPlan.numberToDigitsCutoff default as 2025. An unset cutoff is filled with 2100 at runtime. Both pages now say 2100, and the example uses a 12345 / 1200 pair.

Evidence

  • live API spec (https://api.vapi.ai/api-json, 2026-10-14): FormatPlan.numberToDigitsCutoff declares no default (example: 2025 only), so the spec does not support 2025 as a default either.
  • 2100 runtime default: verified against the current API implementation.

Reviewer note: please confirm with the voice pipeline owner before merging.

Testing Steps

  • fern check (pinned 5.151.1) passes locally
  • Check the preview deployment for the changed page

An unset chunkPlan.formatPlan.numberToDigitsCutoff is filled with 2100 at
runtime; the API schema declares no default.
@chiranjeet-vapi
chiranjeet-vapi force-pushed the docs/number-to-digits-cutoff-default branch from 7d75366 to b33722c Compare October 14, 2026 04:10
@chiranjeet-vapi
chiranjeet-vapi marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2026 16:42
@lightsage-app

lightsage-app Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Lightsage docs evals

Waiting for the staging docs URL before running evals.

Lightsage will start the selected PR evals automatically when GitHub reports a successful docs deployment for this PR. This usually happens within 15 minutes.

Commit: 3080c6f
Status: waiting for staging docs URL

@stephenvapiai
stephenvapiai merged commit 1e6e579 into VapiAI:main Oct 14, 2026
2 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants