Skip to content

CSTACKEX-337: fixing the bug for First VM deployment double-counts template size - #125

Open
sathvikaragi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-337
Open

sathvikaragi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-337

Conversation

@sathvikaragi

@sathvikaragi sathvikaragi commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

template size is counted twice when calculating the minimum primary storagepool size required

Screenshot 2026-10-15 at 6 39 24 PM

Description

storagePoolHasEnoughSpace accepts a pool when allocatedSizeWithTemplate + totalAskingSize fits. On the first VM deploy from a template onto a managed pool, the template size was added on both sides.

For a root volume, the method passes the template into getAllocatedPoolCapacity, which stored it in allocatedSizeWithTemplate. It then adds the volume size and getAskingSizeForTemplateBasedOnClusterAndStoragePool into totalAskingSize. That second call returns the template size again from getBytesRequiredForTemplate when the pool is managed and clusterId is set. The check asked for used bytes + volume size + 2 × template size.

Managed pools now return only getUsedBytes from getAllocatedPoolCapacity. The template is reserved once, in totalAskingSize. This extra add came from Dell's PowerFlex PR.Before that, a managed pool contributed only getUsedBytes to allocatedSizeWithTemplate.

This PR...

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

ISCSI VM creation , allocated size get's only used bytes of pool for first time VM creation
Screenshot 2026-10-15 at 6 52 45 PM
NFS VM creation , allocated size get's only used bytes of pool for first time VM creation
Screenshot 2026-10-15 at 8 37 29 PM
Screenshot 2026-10-15 at 8 38 43 PM
BOTH NFS AND ISCSI POOLS WERE MADE OF 18 GB and succeeded
Screenshot 2026-10-15 at 8 38 52 PM

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

…e template size when calculating the minimum primary storagepool size required by removing template size being added in allocatedpoolcapacity
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 24.85%
Branch coverage 19.02%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

@sathvikaragi
sathvikaragi requested a review from sp16743 October 15, 2026 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant