Skip to content

Codex/shadcn UI migration - #69

Merged
MengMengCode merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/shadcn-ui-migration
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

MengMengCode merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/shadcn-ui-migration

Conversation

@MengMengCode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

Use the Neutral New York component styles while preserving page composition, resource charts, icons and API contracts. Share accessible dialogs, confirmations, notifications and theme tokens across the panel.

Validated with a clean frontend build, dependency audit, mocked interaction regressions, before/after layout comparisons and deployment checks on the test machine.
Support blank-disk KVM creation, persisted ISO mounting and boot order,
scoped installation-media APIs, and lifecycle queue coordination.

Rework image downloads and third-party sources, add a step-based creation
wizard, and improve responsive dialogs, VNC controls and workload icons.
Keep LAN NAT endpoints usable and reject invalid firewall updates atomically.

Validation: frontend production build; go test ./...; real Alpine ISO disk
installation, DHCP/DNS/HTTPS and TCP/UDP NAT checks across guest restart;
responsive UI and deployed read-only regression checks.
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 3, 2026 11:01
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request changes 12162 lines (8121 additions + 4041 deletions) across 79 files, exceeding the repository limit of 3000 changed lines. It has been closed automatically. Please split the changes into smaller pull requests.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Nov 3, 2026
@MengMengCode
MengMengCode merged commit 0abaa3b into main Nov 3, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Tip

🎯 Customize your risk assessments

Guide how CodeRabbit assesses merge risk and security architecture risk. Highlight sensitive changes and explain your security boundaries using Merge Risk Instructions and Security Risk Instructions in your review settings. Security architecture risk assessments require the Advanced plan or above.

✅ Automatic approvals, with your rules

Let CodeRabbit approve pull requests once required threads are resolved, pre-merge checks pass, and your risk limits are met. Enable Automatic approvals in review settings, with overrides for teams or file paths.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

CodeRabbit Verify

  • Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota. Try requesting a review at a lower effort level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants