Repository navigation
Fix return behavior in failure case - #159
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe cache changes how it handles exceptions from canceled handler loads. Functional tests cover repeated failing calls, including cases where the cached value is removed during or after the initial load. ChangesCache load failure handling
Priority: ➖ Normal Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~12 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to Removed failing loads still complete waiting callers with the expected failure, and later calls can retry. No merge-blocking issue is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 12 functions across 4 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Coverage Report for CI Build 37634668469Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 94.055%Details
Uncovered ChangesNo uncovered changes found. Coverage RegressionsNo coverage regressions found. Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
Summary by CodeRabbit