You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing an easy to use suite of tools.
I'm trying to figure out why my OneK1K eQTL benchmark is not getting any correlations.
My process:
Use eQTL Catalogue QTD000620 susie results as source of causal eQTLs (cs with max PiP > 0.9)
Using prediction dimensions that matches cell_type == "natural killer cell" and tissue == "blood", take average across these dimensions for each prediction from decima.vep.predict_variant_effect method, with designated gene columns. (basically taken from the cell_type_match from decima-applications.
After plotting the predicted effect vs the observed beta I found 2 things:
the predictions are mostly positive
the negative effect size variants from 1k1k are almost all positive, as if they're flipped somehow.
The result looks like this: the left are variants that are lower in pip from the cs, and the right are those with pip > 0.9.
Activity
avantikalal commentedon Mar 17, 2026
@MuhammedHasan please take a look
MuhammedHasan commentedon Mar 17, 2026
@jasonbhn Can you provide code or jupyter notebook to reproduce the plots above?
jasonbhn commentedon Mar 18, 2026
@MuhammedHasan thanks! I used the GRCh38.primary_assembly.genome.fa fasta from gencode I believe.
python blocks to get result
cheers
MuhammedHasan commentedon Jun 4, 2026
Hi @jasonbhn,
Following merge request fixes this issue: #57 and it should reproduce the results.